Internet freedom is something that went unchecked for many years, up untill the last decade in the UK. Other countries such as China severely restrict waht people can see. Today however a huge debate sparked up after a wikipedia page was banned on several ISPs which displayed an album cover from the band Scorpions.
The reason this page was banned was because it shows the album cover (Also banned in the UK) Which depicts a nude child.
Now first off, let me state, in my personal opinion using a nude image of a child is wrong. Recently an artist complained on restriction of his art because he was photographing nude children. Can I point out to my readers here that Art is an expression of emotion, if naked children flip these artists buttons then they need locking up before they act out their emotion.
What worries a lot of people in the wikipedia album cover debate however is not the naked child, but more the fact that teh page was blocked by ISPs without any governement interventian, it was infact a seperate body which added this site to their banned list and distributed it to the ISPs.
The body in question is the IWF (Internet Watch Foundation), Britains online child protection watchdog.
In some ways I have to admit I applaud the efforts of these guys and the ISPs in blocking the content. On the other however I worry that this is only the beginning of dictatorship like controls on what we can view online.
There is no doubt that child abuse is wrong, but such a control over our viewing could easily be extended, what would you say if your ISP did not let you shop online anywhere but their own store?
What if the government only let you buy items from the UK to avoid people skipping import tax?
How far would you let this go before you complained?
Recent Comments