Gypsies, Gypos, Travellers, Pikeys, the list goes on for the names of those that travel from place to place in caravans the UK over.
Recently these theiving bastards minority citizens have been recognised legally as just that, a minority. So no longer can you call them thieving fuckers, thats obviously racist because you are referring to the entire race.
So us Brits now have to ignore the fact that following these travellers you will find a trail of destruction, graffiti theft, muggings and rape. Instead we have to look at our statistics and pretend the fact is not their.
We can no longer drive these people out of town like used to be done not so long ago, instead we have to provide them with space and use local tax payer money to clean up and repair the damage.
So my question is, have we, asBritons, eally become too soft?
We now have to accept every one and everything?
Now of course this is where things get interesting, and infact part of the argument used by travelling folk.
It is an undeniable fact that crime follows suite as to the concentration of black people coloured minority citizens.
Therefore if we force gypsies out should we not force black people out too?
Of course there are some differences, black people on the whole are law abiding and more importantly pay taxes, hold down jobs and contribute, unlike travellers who get away with paying little to no tax, especially to the local councils they send into debt.
While crime in predominantly black areas is higher there are just as many people of the same colour trying to combat the crime and live honest lives, and in their case I dont think the majority should be brought down by the minority.
Gypsies on the other and take what they want, do not look after teh land they inhabit and while well known for their ability to work through legal loopholes have been allowed free reign by our government by allowing them minority status.
This country is being slowly run into the ground by namby pamby poncey fucking bureaucrats, the same people who brought gypsies into minority status are also partly responsible for the latest list of unacceptable words, including
Seminal and Disseminate - Related to Semen, too Masculine
Immigrant - calling someone this is now classed as racism
Able bodied should now be non-disabled as it makes them seem ‘less’
Civilisation and Developed Nations is now disallowed as it makes us seem ‘better than’
and Chinese Whisper is obviously racist.
‘Coloured’ is obviously condescending to black people, so we now refer to them as ‘people of colour’ This is obviously a big change and the British Sociological Association is obviously not being even more condescending and blatantly racist by thinking black people will not notice how blatantly racist and condescending this change infact is.
To avoid bigotry against disabled people you can’t call a single disabled person disabled, you may only refer to them in the third person, for example epileptic becomes a person with epilepsy.
To further the slightly Orwellian constraints all the following have been reduced to the same wording
|
Victim of |
Person who has / person with |
Crippled by |
Person who has / person with |
Suffering from |
Person who has / person with |
Afflicted by |
Person who has / person with |
So was someone who contracted AIDs during consensual sex afflicted by or victim of?
We will never find out now.
Oh and someone who is mentally ill is no longer mentally ill, they are a mental health service user.
If yo call them mentally ill prepare to be sued, of course this opens up the debate can anyone use the mental health service since you are not allowed to call a specific person mentally disabled, I may go over and get shot full of relaxants right now to be honest.
Recent Comments